Digital by Design: Crafting Technology for Products and Environments by Troika, Conny Freyer, Sebastien Noel, and Eva Rucki (Amazon UK and USA)

Publisher Thames & Hudson says: 'Digital By Design' is a wide-ranging survey that considers the work of those visionaries who are reimagining the relationship between technology, design products, immersive environments and human interaction for the twenty-first century. The result is a captivating assessment of pioneering approaches in art and design that encompasses a broad spectrum of humanist values, humor, magic and sensory experiences.

In 'Digital by Design', Troika presents a new world of art and design in which the latest digital technologies are explored and exploited, enriching our lives and experience in new and unanticipated ways. Pushing the boundaries of interactive technology and 'intelligent design', the designers and objects featured in 'Digital By Design' are the ones tearing away the closed doors of the science labs and institutions, creating realms of experience, customization and beauty that engage their audience, surroundings and users in new, playful and subversive ways, ultimately bringing the future into the hands of the people.

This is the book that makes digital (or should i say 'interactive'?) design finally steps out of the gadget and design blogs and announces "Hello mainstream! Here we are!'

At the risk of seeing burst into laughter those who say that i play admirably well the 'naivety' card, i will say that i'm a bit confused. There is the word 'design' in the title, the book is written by some of the most talented interaction designers in the world, the forewords and interviews star some of the people who are most intimately associated with design (Paola Antonelli, Dunne & Raby, Ron Arad, Steven Sacks and Mashiko Kusahara.) Yet the description of the book occasionally mentions the word 'art'. And here and there inside the volume, you'll find several installations created by artists.

I'm not happy. Not happy at all. The moment i turn my back on that damn issue 'Is it design? Is it art?' and pretend the question doesn't make much sense, the book lands on my coffee table and brandish its hefty pink arm to throw back the issue at me. Last week only, i was wearing my 'so what?' smile when i saw Pors&Rao's The Uncle Phone and 22 Pop exhibited as art works in one of the booths of the ARCO contemporary art fair in Madrid. A few years ago, these two projects were developed at Interaction Design Institute Ivrea. They were interaction design products at the time. No matter the label you give them, i still like these two projects/art pieces.

Here i am back in the days when a designer would be outraged because i bring up the 'art' word. Or vice-versa. Sometimes designers purposedly -or because it's part of their culture- play with the blurring between art and design. Most of the time they don't. Are the borders between (interactive/digital) design and art so flimsy and vague that we cannot discern any difference between them? Is it fair to throw them in the same basket? Does the whole RCA dream of being exhibited at ars electronica? Would that happen if it were a book about product design where technology wouldn't play a prominent role? Would tea cups be mixed with sculpture? I don't have an answer for that but, even if i believe that both disciplines can only benefit from spending more time with each other, i was hoping that the book would not make the issue even muddier for me. Does it matter? Let's say it doesn't, let's say digital design is a state of mind, a culture and keep on with the review, shall we?

Digital by Design is wonderfully well designed. The graphics are impeccable, the balance between words and images is most charming. The text is limpid, simple and lively. You'll be happy to see your favourite projects featured in the book and, as well as you might think you know the digital design field, i'm sure you will also make quite a few discoveries. Books like this one are precious, go for it!

More images "inside the book'.

This piece originally appeared on Regine Debatty's blog, We Make Money Not Art

Worldchanging ally ReadyMade recently turned us on to a blog in the UK that takes this idea in a new direction. Instead of helping you give away your old junk, How Can I Recycle This encourages you to keep it, and solicit ideas from fellow bloggers about how to re-purpose it into something useful (or at least desirable).

A lot of the suggestions are for craft-type projects (like this bouquet of flowers cut from plastic drink bottles). But there are quite a few more practical suggestions on there also: Old washing machine drum becomes stylish ottoman, an old hollow-core door becomes a desktop, shelving or even art supplies…you get the picture.

One really delightful element of the site is that once people get the recycling bug, they seem to take it into every possible corner of their lives, no matter how small. There are posts asking about recycling every bit of random debris, from the plastic fasteners on bagged loaves of bread to the always-purchased but rarely-eaten, chalky candy Valentine hearts.

Yet another bit of living proof that the ideas are out there to put us on the path to a waste-less world. It's just a matter of asking.

Photo by katiescrapbooklady, licensed by Creative Commons.

Help us change the world - DONATE NOW!

(Posted by Julia Steinberger in Resource - Stuff at 3:12 PM) ]]> http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/worldchanging_fulltext/~3/291278941/008038.html/feed/ 0 http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/worldchanging_fulltext/~3/285628094/008016.html http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/worldchanging_fulltext/~3/285628094/008016.html#comments Wed, 07 May 2008 20:27:12 +0000 WorldChanging Team 8016@http://www.worldchanging.com/

Posted by Clark Williams-Derry for Sightline WORDS

No point, just cool: The New York Times shows what Americans spend their money on -- and how fast prices are rising.

Check out gasoline: it's up 26 percent, year over year. But that's nothing compared to fuel oil: up almost 50 percent. Energy's up across the board, as are plane tickets and plenty of food items. (What's up with eggs? Why are they going up twice as fast as dairy products?)

Great graphic, fun tool, fascinating data -- but beware, if you don't have a lot of time to waste this afternoon, do not click.

Help us change the world - DONATE NOW!

(Posted by WorldChanging Team in Resource - Stuff at 12:27 PM) ]]> http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/worldchanging_fulltext/~3/285628094/008016.html/feed/ 0 http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/worldchanging_fulltext/~3/285563602/008013.html http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/worldchanging_fulltext/~3/285563602/008013.html#comments Wed, 07 May 2008 18:43:27 +0000 Regine Debatty 8013@http://www.worldchanging.com/

by Regine Debatty

Back in July, while I was visiting Documenta 12 in Kassel, I saw a 16-metre-long flower-bed raised above the ground, with 70 packets of seeds sprouting from the grass, each of them carrying worrying labels that documented the latest form of Colonialism: biopiracy.

Photo documenta 12

Biopiracy describes a new form of "colonial pillaging" in which Western corporations reap profits by taking out patents on indigenous plants, food, local knowledge, human tissues and drugs from developing countries and turning them into lucrative products. Only in few cases are the benefits shared with the country of origin.

Biopiracy targets particularly countries known for their exceptionally high level of cultural and biological variety: Mexico, India, Brazil, Indonesia and Australia. This process is also referred to as "internal conquest" in analogy to the "external conquest" of colonialism.

In her Siegesgärten (Victory gardens, 2007) installation, Vienna artist Ines Doujak criticized the bio-politics of EU and the USA which turn a blind eye on the ruthless economization of nature and of life. The seed packets sprouting from the flower-bed informed visitors about global exploitation, genetic engineering and monoculture. On the front of the packets are photo-collages showing drag queens and kings and fetish secual practices set in exotic natural settings. On the back, the conditions and consequences of biopiracy are described and illustrated using real examples of the practice.

"We fear an increasing dependency on large corporations that seek to control global food production and agriculture by means of patents, from milk to bread and from baking grains to energy plants", explained patent expert Christoph Then (via no patents on seeds.)

I had kept the artwork somewhere in the back of my mind, feeling that i needed to investigate the matter deeper. Now, Doujak has collected the images and texts relating to her work in a book which is partly in German and partly in English.

This is an eye-opening book (at least for me). I don't think I'll ever shop the same way again. Except that it's not going to be easy. I can boycott a few cosmetics but how could I live without the giant which has been accused of being the "biggest threat to genetic privacy" for its alleged plan to create a searchable database of genetic information: Google? In her book, Doujak retraces many cases of biopiracy, while giving a context for the practice.

In 1980, Ananda Chakrabarty became the first person to receive a patent for a transgenic organism, a bacterium he had engineered to digest oil. Previously, life forms had been excluded from patent laws. The landmark patent has since paved the way for many others on genetically modified micro-organisms and other life forms.

Five years later, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office allowed GM plants, seeds and plant tissues to be patented. And by 1987 animal patenting followed. Today even human gene sequences, cell lines and stem cells are permitted. Corporate interests can thus corner life forms for the lifetime of a patent and have a monopoly on their exploitation. With the advent of nanotechnology comes the rise of what the Captain Hook Awards call the nanopirates, those who claim ownership of the molecules and even the elements that everything is made from.

Image documenta 12

As Ines Doujak writes in the book:

The stories collected by the artists are fearsome, here's just a couple of them:

- Genetic material from members of some indigenous communities in Brazil and Venezuela can be purchased for 85 dollars through the Internet. It is unclear whether the samples were obtained with the full and informed consent of the individuals and of the Brazilian government. Another issue is whether there are guarantees in place to ensure equitable distribution of the knowledge and profits generated from the samples.

- A coalition of indigenous farmers in Peru protests against the multinational corporation Syngenta's patent for 'terminator technology' potatoes. The patent involves a genetic-modification process that 'switch off' seed fertility, and can therefore prevent farmers from using, storing and sharing seeds and storage organs such as potato tubers. The Indigenous Coalition Against Biopiracy in the Andes says that by commercialising such potatoes, the corporation would threaten more than 3,000 local potato varieties that form the basis of livelihoods and culture for millions of poor people. They also fear that pollen from the modified potatoes could contaminate local varieties and prevent their tubers from sprouting.

Some of the cases described in the book are comforting, they show how organized action can reverse unfair processes. That's what happened with quinoa, a plant cultivated in the Andes for 6000 years. In 1994, scientists from Colorado University were granted a patent to a Bolivian species. This means they could also control the rights to any hybrids created using the Apelawa variety, including many traditional varieties grown by peasant farmers in Bolivia, Peru, Ecuador and Chile as well as varieties important in Bolivia's quinoa export market.

As the president of the Bolivian National Association of Quinoa Producers said at the time: "Our intellectual integrity has been violated by this patent," he said, "Quinoa has been developed by the Andean agriculturists for millennia, it wasn't 'invented' by researchers in North America." Protests proved successful: the patent was dropped in 1998.

A second case with annulment of a questionable patent concerns the Hagahai people (Papua New Guinea). Their first contact with the outside world was in 1984. Viruses and illnesses resulted in this contact decimated the Hagahai to such extent that they were under threat of extinction. Foreign researchers administered the vaccination needed but also took some DNA samples (without their knowledge). They discovered that the people is immune to leukaemia and degenerative neurological illnesses. The genetic qualities of the Hagahai were patented in the United States. Worldwide protests led to the annulment of the patent.

More images from her work at documenta, Kassel.

Help us change the world - DONATE NOW!

(Posted by Regine Debatty in Resource - Stuff at 10:43 AM) ]]> http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/worldchanging_fulltext/~3/285563602/008013.html/feed/ 0